Editor-in-chief
Owns editorial calendar
Sets the publication schedule, approves topic angles, signs off on every guide before it ships, and runs the 30-day re-verify cycle.
◢ Who reviews this content
Editorial reviewers.
We are not licensed social workers, attorneys, or financial planners. Many sites in this space pretend to be. We are journalists who verify federal benefit information against primary sources, every guide, every 30 days.
Honest disclosure
We do not employ LCSWs, attorneys, or CFPs on staff.
Some grant sites claim a panel of credentialed professionals reviews every article. We do not, and we want you to know that up front. What we do have is editors who read federal regulations for a living, cite primary sources on every claim, and ship corrections within 48 hours when we get something wrong. That is the trust model.
◢ The team
GrantsHubUSA Editorial Team.
The team is small. Two researchers, one editor-in-chief, and a rotating circle of subject-matter freelancers. Each guide is signed by the editorial team rather than an individual byline because every guide goes through at least two sets of eyes before publishing.
Research editors (2)
Source verification
Pull primary sources, confirm dollar figures and eligibility thresholds against the cited regulation, and write the first draft of each guide.
Subject freelancers
Topic-specific contributors
Veterans, disability law, housing policy, and tax-credit specialists who contribute fact-check passes on guides in their wheelhouse. Disclosed when relevant.
◢ Want to contribute
Are you a benefits counselor, social worker, or program admin?
We pay freelance fact-check passes on guides relevant to your work. The arrangement is simple: you read a draft, flag anything wrong, and we credit and pay you. No marketing, no posts you have to write, no quotas. Email contact@grantshubusa.com with your background.
Get in touch